Her words.
Ok, I better back up.
She had just completed a diatribe about how "perfect" I am ("Wait," you might be asking, "doesn't she live with you? How does she still think you're perfect?" Good question. I'm a little confused about that one myself). She had listed the areas in which she considers me to be capable and "together." I guess I could have seen this as a compliment. Until the "useless man" comment.
Her reasoning did have some validity, at least on some level. It ran somewhere along the lines of: "Since you can do everything, he won't have to do anything."
Hm.
Though the tone of this conversation was light, and laughter was certainly present, it sure did get me thinking. I have been told before that I can come across--at least at first--as intimidating/confident/independent. In fact, this has been given before as a reason why a specific guy, or guys in general, may have trouble initiating a relationship with me. I don't give off the "I need you" vibe. And I suppose this is not all bad. I don't want to be one of those NEEDY girls. But the problem, evidently, is that I can be too far on the OTHER end of the spectrum.
But lest you worry that the application and processing of these things extended only as far as my love life (or lack thereof), allow me to explain further.
This morning I read the first few chapters of Amos. It's gritty stuff, these minor prophets...a lot of judgement being predicted, let me tell you. But it's a lot of good stuff too. Here's what I found in Amos 4 (I'm reading in The Message these days, so pardon the paraphrase):
"You know, don't you, that I'm the One
who emptied your pantries
and cleaned out your cupboards,
who left you hungry and standing in bread lines?
But you never got hungry for me.
You continued to ignore me.
Yes, I'm the One who stopped the rains
three months short of harvest.
...People would stagger from village to village
crazed for water and never quenching their thirst.
But you never got thirsty for me.
You ignored me."
And on the Lord goes (through Amos, of course), about how He hit their crops with disease, and revisited them with the Egyptian plagues, and hit them with earthquakes and fire. And did it get their attention? No ("But you never looked my way. You continued to ignore me.") He wanted them to acknowledge their need for Him. But they didn't.
It's the same song--different tune--that I read last week in Hosea.
"I'm still your God,
the God who saved you out of Egypt.
I'm the only real God you've ever known.
I'm the One and only God who delivers.
I took care of you during the wilderness hard times,
those years when you had nothing.
I took care of your needs,
gave you everything you needed.
You were spoiled.
You thought you didn't need me.
You forgot me." (13: 4-6)
...and later...
"...Ephraim is finished with the gods that are no-gods.
From now on I'm the One
who answers and satisfies him.
I'm like a luxuriant fruit tree.
Everything you need is found in me." (14: 8)
So this "I don't need you" stamp I sometimes wear on my forehead, lest--heaven forbid--it be obvious that I am needy and vulnerable, is as old as time. And it can get in the way of our relationships with the Lord. It certainly did for Israel.
The moral of this story?
I need to embrace my neediness.
Partly because there is beauty in vulnerability. God created us for relationships in which we can carry each other's burdens, let down our walls, and experience the beauty of community.
But mostly because when we think we're not needy (the key word here is think; of course we are needy whether we acknowledge it or not), we are in danger of forgetting God, like the Israelites did.
And we might miss out on this incredible miracle of finding everything we need in Him, our luxurious fruit tree.